⚔️ Head-to-Head · Gas Handheld Blowers

ECHO PB-2620 vs STIHL BG 86 C-E

The two best gas handheld blowers you can buy — 456 CFM / 15.8 N of raw force against 190 MPH velocity and Easy2Start convenience. Compared spec-by-spec, with a clear pick for each buyer.

TL;DR — These are the top two gas handhelds we’ve reviewed, and they’re separated by a single tenth of a point — the ECHO PB-2620 (8.7) edges the STIHL BG 86 C-E (8.6). The ECHO wins on the numbers that move the most material: higher air volume (456 vs 444 CFM), higher blowing force (15.8 vs 15 N), a 36% bigger fuel tank, a 5-year warranty, and CARB compliance so it’s legal in all 50 states. The STIHL answers with the higher top-end air speed (190 MPH on the flat nozzle), the Easy2Start spring-assist pull that no ECHO matches, and a lower sticker price. Pick the ECHO for maximum power, runtime, and warranty; pick the STIHL for the easiest starts, top velocity on stuck debris, and if you don’t live in California.
🏆 Higher Overall Score
ECHO
PB-2620
8.7/10
★★★★☆
Highest Newton force & CFM in the gas handheld class · 5-yr warranty · CARB-legal
VS
STIHL
BG 86 C-E
8.6/10
★★★★☆
Highest peak MPH · Easy2Start spring-assist · lower price · not sold in California

🔵 Pick the ECHO PB-2620 if…

  • You want the most clearing power — highest CFM and Newton force in the class
  • You run longer sessions and value the 36% larger fuel tank
  • You want the longest coverage — 5-year consumer warranty
  • You live in California or any CARB state (the STIHL isn’t sold there)

🟢 Pick the STIHL BG 86 C-E if…

  • You want the easiest possible start — Easy2Start needs only a slow pull
  • You blow a lot of wet or stuck debris and want the 190 MPH peak velocity
  • You want the lower sticker price
  • You value STIHL’s dealer service network and two-nozzle versatility

📋 Spec-by-Spec

SpecECHO PB-2620STIHL BG 86 C-EEdge
BlowingYards Score8.7 / 108.6 / 10ECHO
Engine25.4cc 2-stroke27.2cc 2-MIXContext
Air Volume456 CFM444 CFMround / 365 flatECHO
Air Speed (peak)172 MPH190 MPHflat / 154 roundSTIHL
Blowing Force15.8 N15 NECHO
Fuel Tank20.3 oz14.9 ozECHO
Weight (dry)9.8 lbs9.7 lbsSTIHL
Start SystemStandard recoilEasy2Start™STIHL
Noise70 dB(A)70 dB(A)Tie
Fuel Mix50:150:1Tie
Warranty5-yr consumer2-yrECHO
CARB / CA-legalYes — all 50 statesNot sold in CAECHO
Est. Price~$260–330~$249STIHL
Vacuum ModeBlower onlyBlower onlySH 86 C-E is the vacTie
6
ECHO wins
4
STIHL wins
3
Ties

Note on engine size: the STIHL runs a larger 27.2cc displacement, but the ECHO’s 25.4cc chrome-cylinder engine produces higher measured blowing force — so displacement alone doesn’t decide it. The STIHL’s two figures reflect its two included nozzles: the flat nozzle maximises MPH, the round nozzle maximises CFM.

📊 Category Scores, Side by Side

These are the five categories both reviews score in common, drawn straight from each blower’s BlowingYards review. Each machine also carries one category unique to its own review — shown separately below rather than compared head-to-head, since they measure different things.

Airflow PowerECHO 9.1
9.1
8.7
Air VelocitySTIHL 9.2
8.4
9.2
Ease of StartSTIHL 9.0
7.5
9.0
Build QualitySTIHL 9.3
9.2
9.3
ValueECHO 9.1
9.1
7.7
ECHO — category unique to its review
Newton Force 9.5
The ECHO review scores blowing force as its own category, reflecting the class-leading 15.8 N measurement — the single number that best predicts real-world clearing power.
STIHL — category unique to its review
Ergonomics 8.6
The STIHL review scores ergonomics as its own category, reflecting the four-spring anti-vibration system and soft-grip handle built for long, comfortable sessions.

⚖️ Where Each One Wins

🔵 The ECHO PB-2620’s Edge

⚡ More raw clearing power. At 15.8 N and 456 CFM, the PB-2620 out-forces and out-volumes the STIHL. It moves more material per pass — the difference you feel most on big dry leaf piles and open cleanup.

⛽ 36% more fuel on board. The 20.3 oz tank runs roughly 80–90 minutes of active use versus the STIHL’s ~60 — often the difference between finishing a large lot in one go or stopping to refuel.

🛡️ The longest warranty in the class. Five years of consumer coverage against STIHL’s two. For a seasonally used tool, that’s real peace of mind the STIHL can’t match on paper.

🇺🇸 Legal in all 50 states. The PB-2620 meets CARB and EPA Tier III standards — so it’s available in California, where the STIHL BG 86 C-E simply isn’t sold.

🟢 The STIHL BG 86 C-E’s Edge

🔧 Easy2Start™ — the best start in the class. A spring stores the energy so a slow, gentle pull fires the engine every time. The ECHO’s standard recoil can feel stiff cold, especially through break-in. This is the STIHL’s clearest advantage.

🌀 Higher top-end air speed. The flat nozzle hits 190 MPH versus the ECHO’s 172 — better for dislodging wet, compacted leaves and debris stuck to pavement, where velocity matters more than volume.

🔄 Two nozzles, two jobs. Swap the flat nozzle (speed) for the round nozzle (444 CFM volume) to match the task — versatility the single-configuration ECHO doesn’t offer out of the box.

💰 Lower sticker price & deep dealer network. At ~$249 it typically undercuts the ECHO, and STIHL’s dealer service and genuine-parts availability are among the strongest in outdoor power equipment.

🔍 The Decisions That Actually Matter

⚡ Force & Volume vs. Velocity — Which Numbers Should Decide It

The cleanest way to read this matchup: the ECHO wins the volume-and-force game, the STIHL wins the velocity game. Newton force (15.8 vs 15 N) and CFM (456 vs 444) both favour the ECHO — those are the numbers that determine how much material you move per pass, which is what matters for large dry leaf loads and general open-area cleanup.

Air speed (190 vs 172 MPH) favours the STIHL, and it isn’t a throwaway spec. MPH is what breaks the surface grip of wet, matted leaves and debris stuck to pavement or lodged in cracks. If most of your work is heavy, damp, stuck-down material, the STIHL’s flat-nozzle velocity is the more useful edge. If it’s big volumes of loose, dry debris, the ECHO’s force and CFM win out.

ECHO for volume & force. STIHL for top-end velocity on stuck, wet debris.

🔧 The Start System — STIHL’s Most Persuasive Argument

If there’s one thing that flips buyers to the STIHL, it’s Easy2Start. The “C-E” suffix adds a spring between the crankshaft and the recoil rope: it stores energy from a slow pull and releases it to turn the engine through compression, so the machine fires without the sharp, forceful jerk a conventional starter needs. Reviewers routinely describe a two-finger pull starting it.

The ECHO uses a standard recoil pull. Broken in, it starts reliably — but owners consistently note it can feel stiff cold, particularly through the first 5–10 hours. This is reflected in the scores: the STIHL takes Ease of Start 9.0 to the ECHO’s 7.5, the widest single-category gap between the two. If you pull a cord many times a day, or anyone in the household finds gas blowers hard to start, the STIHL’s advantage here is worth real money.

Ease of Start: STIHL 9.0 vs ECHO 7.5 — the biggest single-category gap.

🇺🇸 The CARB Question — A Hard Yes/No Before You Compare Anything Else

For a large share of buyers, this decides it before any spec does. The STIHL BG 86 C-E does not meet California Air Resources Board Tier III standards and is not sold or shipped to California. The ECHO PB-2620 is CARB and EPA Tier III compliant and available in all 50 states.

If you’re in California, the comparison is effectively over — the ECHO wins by default (or you move to a cordless handheld). Everywhere else, CARB compliance is still a mild point in the ECHO’s favour for resale and future-proofing, but it won’t override the STIHL’s start-system and velocity advantages if those matter more to you.

In California, the ECHO wins automatically — the STIHL isn’t available.

💰 Price, Warranty & Long-Term Cost

On the sticker, the STIHL is usually the cheaper buy at ~$249 against the ECHO’s ~$260–330. Over the life of the tool, the gap narrows: the ECHO’s 5-year consumer warranty is more than double the STIHL’s 2 years, and its larger fuel tank means fewer interruptions. The STIHL counters with a 2-MIX engine that delivers up to 20% lower fuel consumption than a conventional 2-stroke, plus a dealer network that makes parts and service easy to get for years.

Neither is the “cheap” choice — both are premium tools built to last a decade with care. The honest read: the STIHL costs less up front and sips fuel; the ECHO covers you longer and runs longer between fill-ups.

STIHL: lower price, better fuel economy. ECHO: longer warranty, bigger tank.

Which Should You Buy?

There’s no wrong answer here — these are the two best gas handheld blowers we’ve tested, and only a tenth of a point separates them. The ECHO PB-2620 takes the overall edge on power, runtime, warranty, and nationwide availability. The STIHL BG 86 C-E earns its place with the easiest start in the category, the highest top-end velocity, and a lower price. Match the machine to how you actually work.

🔵 Buy the ECHO PB-2620 if…

  • You want the most clearing power — class-leading force and CFM
  • You run long sessions and want the bigger tank
  • You want the longest warranty (5 years)
  • You’re in California or any CARB state
  • You already run ECHO equipment
Read the full ECHO PB-2620 review →

🟢 Buy the STIHL BG 86 C-E if…

  • You want the easiest, most reliable start — Easy2Start
  • You blow a lot of wet or stuck debris (190 MPH peak)
  • You want two nozzles for speed vs volume
  • You want the lower price and STIHL dealer support
  • You’re not in California
Read the full STIHL BG 86 C-E review →